Skip to content
Products / Polaris
Trade Surveillance

Trade Surveillance for the Age of AI

Trade surveillance that reduces compliance friction and increases business velocity.

01

Broadest Asset Coverage

10 asset classes as first-class citizens — from equities and FX to crypto and prediction markets.

02

AI-First

Rules, statistics and ML as first-class peers — with frontier-model filtering inside your tenant.

03

Live in Weeks, at Scale

Market data included, production in 4–8 weeks, engineered for full-population scale.

Built on extensive customer feedback and decades of experience

Polaris was designed from a clean sheet, informed by in-depth interviews with 50+ institutional customers on the persistent failures of legacy trade surveillance. The patterns recurred across the cohort — each a problem the industry has lived with for decades, each addressed by a deliberate design choice in Polaris.

Behavox Polaris
Legacy trade surveillance

All 10 asset classes on one platform — equities, FX, fixed income, commodities, crypto and prediction markets. Adding a new asset class is a configuration exercise, not a new vendor contract.

Asset-class coverage too narrow — separate platforms or vendors required per asset class

Every detection scenario maps to the specific regulation it enforces — 35 detection policies, 263 individual situations, each with a cited regulatory source. Behavox maintains the mapping; your team does not need to research the rules.

No clear link between what the system detects and the regulation it covers — defensibility in an examination depends on manual reconstruction

Market data included — reference data, prices, fixings and benchmarks, pre-mapped at the point of delivery. One contract covers the data and the platform.

Market data not included — procurement and integration left to the customer

Production in 4–8 weeks. AI proposes the data mapping from your source systems; your engineers review and approve field by field.

Integration took years

Built on Google Cloud with automatic scaling — maintains alert delivery through year-end, earnings seasons and volatility spikes, without customer capacity planning.

Inadequate scale — alerts missed or delayed during high-volume periods

AI reduces alert volume by up to 95% — with a human reviewer on every compliance decision and identical detection coverage regardless of configuration.

Too many false positives

35 detection scenarios and 263 situation variants — each configurable to your firm's risk profile, business model and market. Self-service adjustment; no vendor change-request for routine tuning.

Cannot calibrate detection to the firm's risk profile

Test any detection change against real historical data before deploying — side by side with the live model. Validate coverage and calibrate thresholds before going live; no disruption risk from adjustments.

No way to test detection changes before they go live

Broadest asset coverage — crypto and prediction markets included

Same platform, same data layer, same detection engine across the full taxonomy of regulated trading activity. Extending to a new asset class is a configuration exercise, not a re-platforming engagement — one platform, one analyst console, one model-risk framework across the firm.

Equities
Fixed Income
FX
Commodities
Digital Assets / Crypto
Prediction Markets
Money Markets
Structured Products
Funds & CIS
Environmental Products

Mapped from regulation to detection — for defensibility

The Behavox Unified Risk Taxonomy (URT) is maintained by a dedicated in-house team of regulatory researchers, market-abuse analysts and detection engineers, mapping regulatory regimes to specific risk policies and situations. Audit-defensible coverage at deployment: your engineers don't research regulation — Behavox does. Every policy is version-controlled, attributed and dated, and carries its regime citation, definition, parameters and validation evidence.

35Policies
263Situations
8Risk categories
Risk familyPoliciesSituations
Price manipulation13102
Cross-market / cross-asset439
Insider trading & info misuse433
Circular trading531
Conduct & fair dealing425
Manipulative practices213
Structural / control circumvention213
Conflicts of interest17

Three detection methods. One platform.

A taxonomy is only as good as the detection behind it. Higher recall. Lower false-positive rate. One model-risk framework. Rules, statistics and machine learning run as first-class peers — each catches what the others miss. Behavox AI sits downstream as an optional filter.

Rules

Explicit · explainable · configurable. Every alert exposes which rule fired, which threshold was breached, and which data triggered it.

Statistical

Peer-relative · FDR-controlled. Six method families (BOCPD, CUSUM, Granger, transfer entropy, KS, Mann–Whitney, Gini, CAR) — each trader benchmarked against a peer group drawn from the data.

Machine learning

Multi-feature · SHAP-explained. Catches what rules and statistics miss; every alert ships a per-feature contribution score, deployable inside SR 26-2 / SR 11-7 model governance.

▼  then, optionally, filtered downstream

Behavox AI Filter optional

Frontier-model reasoning inside your tenant — context, prioritisation, triage, applied downstream of all three detection methods. A human reviewer on every decision.

Alerts route through your L1 · L2 · L3 investigation tiers as a single auditable case file per coordinated episode, with an end-to-end audit trail. Cross-product detection links instruments across three layers — declared reference data, derived benchmark/structural relationships, and behaviourally discovered correlations — so coordinated episodes that span asset classes are caught, not dropped.

State-of-the-art AI for false-positive suppression

Detection generates the alerts; AI keeps the queue manageable. Behavox AI brings frontier-model reasoning to every alert — inside your tenant, under full model governance, with a human reviewer on every compliance decision. Customers see up to a 95% reduction in alert volumes. You choose the configuration; detection coverage and the audit trail are identical across all three.

1 · Enrichment

Context added to every alert (e.g. the news cycle around a P&L spike). No change to routing or priority.

2 · Prioritisation

High-risk alerts with no explanatory context surface first; the queue is reordered, never reduced.

3 · Triage

Low-confidence alerts route to a QA pathway; above-materiality episodes bypass QA to L1 — STR/STOR SLA preserved.

No autonomous compliance decisions. Third-party model providers, where used, are consumed via enterprise private endpoints with zero data retention; alert content is processed inside your tenant.

Behavox Scout — a mini-Quant for every reviewer

Once an alert lands, the investigator needs answers fast. Plain-English queries. Read-only by design. Audit-grade evidence packets attached to every response. Investigators answer their own research questions in minutes, not hours — Cmd+K from anywhere, and Scout plans, executes and returns the evidence (it cannot mutate state, alter alerts or change rules).

"Show me every WTI futures short within 30 minutes of the Platts MOC window in the last five days, ranked by basis-deviation Z-score against spot."

1,408trades scanned
23shorts in-window
5traders involved
2on the watchlist

→ Trader T-301 tops the ranking — a 4.2 basis-deviation Z-score across six pre-MOC shorts in CLG and CLH over four days — and T-202 is already on your watchlist.

AI you can defend to your model-risk committee

  • Configuration is AI-assistedWizard (generate a config from a plain-English goal) · Tune (refine from a complaint) · Explain (plain-English on any parameter) · What-If (replay candidates against historical data).
  • Scenario Testing Lab (STL) — test new or modified logic against real production data, side-by-side with the live model, with no live alerts generated. Validation reports fold into the model-risk package.
  • Model Validation Portal — feature contributions per alert (SHAP), version history with diffs, training-data summary, performance by method, drift alerts. Vendor updates require client-side STL validation; you can freeze versions during a regulatory examination.
  • EU AI Act — Polaris carries a high-risk classification, with conformity documentation aligned to Articles 9, 11 and 14.

Trade Reconstruction

Complete, regulatory-formatted trade timelines in under 72 hours — vs. multiple business days on legacy platforms. Initiated from within an alert or Scout search; formatted for regulatory submission including FINRA, SEC, CFTC, FCA, MAR, ESMA; immutable post-generation.

AI-assisted integration — months become weeks

AI proposes the field-by-field mapping from your source systems into the canonical surveillance data model; your data engineer accepts, refines or overrides line-by-line. Production-quality streams in 4–8 weeks — and the same methodology maps your existing detection models (rules, thresholds, classifiers) from the incumbent system into Polaris, with historical alerts and training data where the legacy platform permits export. Market data is included — LSEG/Refinitiv plus specialty providers for prediction markets, crypto venues, on-chain oracles and energy benchmarks — removed from your scope entirely.

Trusted by leading institutions
BNYDanske BankMizuhoPerella Weinberg PartnersBrevan HowardCerberusVitolGlencoreMoeveCitgoR.J. O’Brien

Frequently asked questions

What asset classes does Polaris cover?
Polaris covers all 10 asset classes on one platform — equities, fixed income, FX, commodities, money markets, structured products, funds & CIS, environmental products, digital assets/crypto and prediction markets — so extending coverage is a configuration exercise, not a new vendor contract.
How does Polaris reduce alert volume without weakening detection?
Detection runs through rules, statistics and machine learning as first-class peers, and Behavox AI is applied only downstream as an optional filter for enrichment, prioritization and triage — reducing alert volumes by up to 95% while detection coverage and the audit trail stay identical, with a human reviewer on every decision.
How long does it take to bring Polaris into production?
AI-assisted integration proposes the field-by-field mapping from your source systems for a data engineer to review, taking production-quality data live in 4–8 weeks — versus the years legacy integrations have historically taken.

See it on your own data

Book a 30-minute session tailored to your firm's risk, channels and regulatory footprint.

Request a Demo